Access2

Unveiling Trust Dilemmas in the Security Industry: A Survey Analysis

Access2-Survey-Results-Security-Industry

Stephen King, the author and horror specialist, once said that the trust of the innocent is the liar’s most useful tool. We mention that because a survey we conducted at The Security Event suggests that our sector also relies heavily on trust. It’s a major part of the locksmith’s toolbox, an essential for all architectural ironmongers and is key to a great customer relationship. That’s why it’s worrying to also find survey results which suggest an alarming number of those in the industry may not be taking as much care of this critical business asset as they should.

Survey Results

In our survey, we deliberately set out to ask some provocative questions. The issue of trust was first raised when we asked whether hardware security buyers understand enough about the products they are sourcing.

Around one-third of those questioned answered in the positive, but the remainder gave responses which varied from a definite ‘no’ to several which said buyers simply put their trust in the supplier to deliver what they need.

This raises two issues:

1)     The low level of understanding within the customer base

2)     The fundamental importance of the supplier’s own integrity and knowledge.

Within the industry, it’s easy to throw jargon around and assume that your message is getting through, but most buyers don’t have the specialist knowledge required to make informed decisions. All professionals in this industry need to find ways to enhance understanding and not rely solely on their ‘expert’ status.

Balancing Trust and Priorities

Our second question was, “Quality, accreditations, price or brand name? What is it that seals the deal?”

Quality was the firm favourite, cited by 57 per cent of those questioned. 26% favoured accreditations, and in an apparent contradiction to the resounding endorsement of trust. Only 14 per cent said that the brand was the deciding factor with just 3% mentioning the supplier relationship. While we appreciate the endorsement of quality and high standards, it perplexes us that no one cited price as a deciding factor in a purchase.

In this report of our survey findings, we’ve deliberately left the most controversial question until last. Although the other two questions give plenty of food for thought, this one is ringing the alarm bells. When we asked whether respondents would promote a product that was easy to work with and had great aesthetics even if its security wasn’t up to scratch, 37% said that they would.

Now we’ll admit that we didn’t add complexity to the question by examining differing levels of security required. But we did make it plain that the ease of use and appearance were the product’s benefits.

Let’s go back to that finding. At a key event for the security trade, over one-third of those attendees who answered our question were prepared to promote products which conferred inadequate protection.

Trust and Accountability in Security

Hopefully, it’s not just us who sees the contradiction. Around two-thirds of buyers rely on and trust their supplier. But over one-third of those suppliers are prioritising their own convenience or selling something based on its aesthetics, not its performance.

Going back to that quote from Stephen King, we’re not saying that anyone is being lied to. We are, however, highlighting the fact that many buyers are ‘innocents’ when it comes to security products. The industry trusts, and eroding that trust would be a genuine horror story for everyone involved.

We’d like to thank all those who participated in our survey for their cooperation and for their frank responses to our challenging questions.

Keep the conversation going

More Posts

Why it pays off to invest in mechatronic or electronic security technology

Security has moved on. Traditional mechanical cylinders still have their place, but today’s buildings demand more: greater control, better auditability, remote management, and future-ready flexibility. That’s where mechatronic and electronic security technology delivers measurable value. One standout example is the TOKOZ ePRO mechatronic cylinder, a solution that intelligently blends mechanical robustness with electronic access control. It represents a smart evolution rather than a wholesale replacement of proven mechanical security. What is Mechatronic Security? Mechatronic security combines: The result? A cylinder that looks and installs like a traditional euro profile lock, but operates within a controlled electronic ecosystem. The TOKOZ ePRO Advantage The TOKOZ ePRO cylinder functions like a standard euro profile cylinder, meaning: Installation is straightforward, with no radical door modifications required, making it ideal for retrofit projects as well as new builds. But beyond mechanical familiarity lies its real strength: electronic access control embedded inside a secure cylinder platform. Why investing in Mechatronic Technology pays off 1. Enhanced access control without replacing every door With mechanical-only systems, lost keys often mean expensive cylinder changes. With mechatronic systems: This dramatically reduces long-term operational costs. 2. Full audit trail and accountability Traditional keys leave no record. Mechatronic cylinders provide: For commercial, healthcare, education, and multi-occupancy buildings, this level of oversight is increasingly essential for compliance and risk management. 3. Flexibility for changing environments Buildings evolve. Staff change. Tenants rotate. Security requirements increase. The TOKOZ ePRO system allows: This adaptability ensures the system continues to deliver value long after installation. 4. Retaining mechanical security strength One common concern with electronic systems is durability. The ePRO addresses this by maintaining: You gain electronic control without sacrificing mechanical integrity. 5. Future-proofing your security investment Electronic and mechatronic access control is no longer niche — it is rapidly becoming standard in: Investing now reduces the risk of premature system obsolescence. A mechatronic platform provides a transitional pathway from purely mechanical to fully integrated electronic systems when required. Mechanical vs Mechatronic: The Real Difference Mechanical Only Mechatronic No audit trail Full event logging Physical rekeying required Credentials programmable Fixed access structure Flexible, scalable access hierarchy Lower upfront cost Lower lifetime management cost While initial investment may be higher, the total cost of ownership is often significantly lower with mechatronic systems. A smart upgrade, not a compromise The TOKOZ ePRO mechatronic cylinder demonstrates how modern access control does not have to mean complexity. It installs like a standard euro cylinder, works with traditional mortice locks, and operates with familiar key functionality — yet adds intelligence, flexibility, and accountability. For organisations looking to enhance security without rebuilding infrastructure, mechatronic technology offers a practical, scalable, and financially sound solution. If security is critical to your building’s integrity, compliance, and operational efficiency, sticking purely with mechanical systems may limit your control and increase long-term costs. Mechatronic solutions like TOKOZ ePRO provide: In today’s security landscape, that combination isn’t a luxury, it’s a strategic advantage.

Read More >
A photograph of school children raising their hands. There are approximately 10 children in the image sat in a well lit classroom. They are wearing blue school jumpers over white shirts.

Preparing School Locking Strategies for Martyn’s Law

Martyn’s Law, introduced to improve security in public spaces, is prompting schools and other organisations to re-evaluate their locking strategies. With safety under greater scrutiny, it’s important for facility managers and school administrators to understand the options available and ensure their buildings are prepared. Classroom vs Clutch Cylinders: What You Need to Know With the introduction of Martyn’s Law, building locking strategies—particularly in education and public spaces—are coming under greater scrutiny. One area often overlooked is the difference between Classroom and Clutch lock functions. In a barricade situation, a Clutch Cylinder allows a keyholder to override the internal thumbturn from outside, whilst still allowing the door to be locked from inside the room. This helps maintain control of the space while preventing unauthorised access. Traditionally, many educational buildings have used Classroom Function, but in certain situations a Clutch Function may provide a more appropriate solution. How Access2 Can Help At Access2, we can help convert Classroom cylinders to Clutch Function without affecting the existing master key system. This means schools can upgrade their locking strategy quickly and efficiently, ready for the next term or planned refurbishment. If you’d like to review your current setup or discuss options, feel free to get in touch with our team.

Read More >

Solverwp- WordPress Theme and Plugin